<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.orenblog.org/2009/06/23/twitter-and-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.orenblog.org/2009/06/23/twitter-and-blogging/</link>
	<description>This is where you say something clever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bush</title>
		<link>http://blog.orenblog.org/2009/06/23/twitter-and-blogging/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Bush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orenblog.org/?p=2435#comment-747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find this to be true. Since joining Facebook mid-2008, I find that my blog posts have become longer and more substantial. It&#039;s just easier--and received by a wider audience--to update my FB status (which is essentially the same as a Twitter &quot;tweet&quot;). I think the stratification of blogging into &quot;micro&quot; and more substantial posts is a good thing, for two reasons. First, it opens up the medium to more people who might be intimidated by writing a full post but are happy to jot off 140 characters. Second, it (hopefully) will return some substance to blog posts: research, analysis, photos, links, etc. At least, that&#039;s what I&#039;m striving for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this to be true. Since joining Facebook mid-2008, I find that my blog posts have become longer and more substantial. It&#8217;s just easier&#8211;and received by a wider audience&#8211;to update my FB status (which is essentially the same as a Twitter &#8220;tweet&#8221;). I think the stratification of blogging into &#8220;micro&#8221; and more substantial posts is a good thing, for two reasons. First, it opens up the medium to more people who might be intimidated by writing a full post but are happy to jot off 140 characters. Second, it (hopefully) will return some substance to blog posts: research, analysis, photos, links, etc. At least, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m striving for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

