Archive for August, 2005



Open format music downloads from Audio Lunchbox

I think I’ve glimpsed the future, and it’s available now at Audio Lunchbox!

Chris Anderson pointed me to Audio Lunchbox in his Long Tail Blog posting on niche aggregators.

AL offers downloadable music for the same 99 cents a song as the other downloading services, but the songs are available in regular mp3 or ogg vorbis formats.

While there isn’t the same breadth of major label coverage as at iTunes or Napster, it’s not just totally obscure artists either. Names I recognize from an initial perusing range from Joe Strummer and the Mescaleros, Doc Watson, and Steve Earle to Al Jarreau, Albert Ayler and the Rebirth Brass Band. Not to mention my childhood neighbor Stu Goldberg.

That’s right – legal, downloadable music from real record labels in open, non-copy-protected digital formats.

I know that Audio Lunchbox will be the first place I stop when looking for new music online.

Teaching with computer games

Changing the Game: What Happens When Video Games Enter the Classroom? is an interesting new article (registration required) by Kurt Squire on his experience using Civilization III to teach high school history.

In my study, failure was not only a “problem” but also a critical precondition for learning. Failure forced students to confront gaps or flaws in their current understandings through cycles of recursive play. As one student explained, “Playing the game forces you to learn about the material. It actually forces you to learn about other civilizations in order to survive.” For this student, failure necessitated learning the identities, origins, and resources of various civilizations through cycles of identifying problems, developing causal interpretations of events, brainstorming possible solutions, implementing solutions, and examining results. After going through these cycles of recursive play, students’ thinking became more complex. Success and even survival in the game required deep thinking across diverse problem spaces.

What – no Jethro Tull?

69Poster21

My brother Dan was in town this past weekend, just back from four years working in London for the US State Department.

While we were swapping folk-festival stories he recalled that at last years Cropredy Festival in the UK he saw Jethro Tull. That got me sort of nostalgic, recalling the time I saw Tull open for the MC5 at Eagles Auditorium in 1969, and it got me in the mood to listen to Benefit, so off I went to Napster to find it. Nope. Not only no Benefit, no Jethro Tull at all. So I tried iTunes. Same deal.

Whassup with that?

Joel hits the high notes

I really enjoyed Joel Spolsky’s latest essay, Hitting the High Notes, where he talks about how to have a successful software company you really need to hire the best programmers. It’s full of good lines, like:

The real trouble with using a lot of mediocre programmers instead of a couple of good ones is that no matter how long they work, they never produce something as good as what the great programmers can produce.

Five Antonio Salieris won’t produce Mozart’s Requiem. Ever. Not if they work for 100 years.

Five Jim Davis’s — creator of that unfunny cartoon cat, where 20% of the jokes are about how Monday sucks and the rest are about how much the cat likes lasagna (and those are the punchlines!) … five Jim Davis’s could spend the rest of their lives writing comedy and never, ever produce the Soup Nazi episode of Seinfeld.

The Creative Zen team could spend years refining their ugly iPod knockoffs and never produce as beautiful, satisfying, and elegant a player as the Apple iPod. And they’re not going to make a dent in Apple’s market share because the magical design talent is just not there. They don’t have it.

The mediocre talent just never hits the high notes that the top talent hits all the time. The number of divas who can hit the f6 in Mozart’s Queen of the Night is vanishingly small, and you just can’t perform The Queen of the Night without that famous f6.

You really should go read it.

Corey Doctorow on rumors of Apple will use Intel’s Trusted Computing features

What is it with these misnomered copy protection schemes?

First it was Digital Rights Management, now Microsoft has Plays For Sure.

In between came Trusted Computing, an effort to engineer copy protection into hardware.

Cory Doctorow says in a post yesterday that the early versions of the Mac OS X on Intel hardware makes use of Intel’s version of Trusted Computing, and if that turns out to be true when it goes into production, he will no longer buy Macs, which he’s used since 1979.

The point of Trusted Computing is to make it hard — impossible, if you believe the snake-oil salesmen from the Trusted Computing world — to open a document in a player other than the one that wrote it in the first place, unless the application vendor authorizes it. It’s like a blender that will only chop the food that Cuisinart says you’re allowed to chop. It’s like a car that will only take the brand of gas that Ford will let you fill it with. It’s like a web-site that you can only load in the browser that the author intended it to be seen in.

What this means is that “open formats” is no longer meaningful. An application can write documents in “open formats” but use Trusted Computing to prevent competing applications from reading them. Apple may never implement this in their own apps (though I’ll be shocked silly if it isn’t used in iTunes and the DVD player), but Trusted Computing in the kernel is like a rifle on the mantelpiece: if it’s present in act one, it’ll go off by act three.

It means that the price of being a Mac user will be eternal vigilance: you’ll need to know that your apps not only write to exportable formats, but that they also allow those exported files to be read by competing apps. That they eschew those measures that would lock you in and prevent you from giving your business to someone else. I’m pretty sure that apps like BBEdit and NetNewsWire won’t lock me out, as their authors are personally known to me to be wonderful, generous, honorable people. But personally familiarizing yourself with the authors of all the software you use doesn’t scale.

So that means that if Apple carries on down this path, I’m going to exercise my market power and switch away, and, for the first time since 1979, I won’t use an Apple product as my main computer. I may even have my tattoo removed.

My data is my life, and I won’t keep it in a strongbox that someone else has the keys for.

wow.

Online music: The whole is less than the sum of the parts

What’s wrong with this musical picture?

I gladly admit to being a music junkie – I spent a good part of my younger life playing music for a living, I still play when I can, and I am constantly looking for (and finding) new things to listen to. Sure, I still go back and listen to old favorites, but that has no impact on the drive to discover music yet unheard, artists yet unknown.

I am also pressed for time and have enough income that I am willing to spend some money to acquire music the easy and convenient way.

So the emergence of commercial online music sources should be exactly what I need – lots of information about the artists (usually from the All Music Guide), ways of cross-linking performers and genres, wide (if not comprehensive) selection, and good (if not great) quality sound files.

I’ve been an avid user of the iTunes Music Store since it first went live, and lately I’ve enjoyed trying out the Napster To Go subscription service with a Dell DJ portable player.

So what’s not to like?

It’s the damn copy protection, of course. Let me explain.

I have two computers at work – one Mac and one Windows box. I have a Mac laptop. I have two computers at home, again one Mac and one PC, plus I have a Slim Devices Squeezebox for streaming digital music to my stereo. I have a Rio flash memory mp3 player and would like to buy a hard drive player.

The music purchased from iTunes will play on both Mac and Windows (as long as I use the iTunes application in both places), but not on the Squeezebox or on the Rio or the DJ. The Napster music will work on Windows PCs (as long as I use the Napster application) and on the DJ, but not on the Macs, the Squeezebox, or the Rio.

In addition, there is no way to integrate music from Napster and iTunes together into a single collection, which should be one of the great advantages of managing a music collection on a computer.

All this in the interest of trying to lock up the music so I won’t put it up on a peer-to-peer filesharing network – which I wasn’t going to do do anyway.

Do I occasionally make copies of songs or even entire albums for my friends? Sure – we’ve all been doing that since the advent of cassette recorders in the early ’70s. I didn’t notice that having a negative impact on record sales over the years – did you?

At least with iTunes there are ways of making the files work on other systems. Funny thing – I haven’t noticed Apple’s sales declining either.

So, as much as I’m enjoying the all-you-can-eat model of the Napster subscription, I’m not going to buy an account. I’m sorry, but I’m not willing to let my choice of computing environments be dictated by what music service will play where.

Astute historians will recall that none of this is new – the music industry has a long history of combatting the rise of new ways of enjoying music:

In 1907 the sheet music industry fought against player-piano rolls:

White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company 209 U.S. 1 (1907) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that manufacturers of music rolls for player pianos did not have to pay royalties to the composers. The ruling was based on a holding that the piano rolls were not copies of the plaintiffs’ copyrighted sheet music, but were instead parts of the machine that reproduced the music.

This case was subsequently eclipsed by Congress’s intervention in the form of an amendment to the Copyright Act in 1909, introducing a compulsory license for the manufacture and distribution of such “mechanical” embodiments of musical works.

You can see Chapter 11 of Donald Clarke’s The Rise and Fall of Popular Music for details about the running battles among the record companies and radio stations and publishers during the 1940′s that led to ASCAP publishers boycotting radio stations and a musicians strike.

Right up to the late ’70s where the industry blamed a sales slump on the advent of home taping on cassette recorders:

…anyone who rewinds to the last major music-biz slump will find some interesting parallels. In 1978, record sales began to fall, and the major labels blamed a larcenous new technology: cassette tapes. The international industry even had an outraged official slogan: “Home taping is killing music.” The idea was that music fans—ingrates that they are—would rather pirate songs than pay for them, and that sharing favorite songs was a crime against hard-working musicians (rather than great word-of-mouth advertising). Cassettes were so anathema to the biz that Sex Pistols Svengali Malcolm McLaren could think of no more provocative way to launch his new band, Bow Wow Wow, than with a ode to home taping, “C30, C60, C90, Go!”

By the time Bow Wow Wow bowed in 1980, however, the crisis was almost over. It turned out that home taping had not killed music. Instead, the central problem was the collapsing popularity of dance-pop—lively, sexy, but personality-free music whose appeal was broad but thin. They called it disco back then, and the name has never recovered from the era’s backlash. Although usually termed teen-pop, the music of ‘N Sync and Britney Spears is not unlike disco: Both are intellectually underachieving, cookie-cutter styles that have made stars of performers not known primarily for their skills as singers, songwriters, or musicians.

And so it continues to the present day. Mark Cuban hits the nail on the head yesterday with an essay titled “The definition of insanity.. The Music Industry”, where he says:

There is an old saying that the definition of insanity is, “Doing the same thing over and over again expecting the outcome to change”

I think of this saying everytime I hear about music industry efforts to impact piracy.

After some great summations of the details he goes on to conclude:

The music industry has a very unique opportunity to really re-establish itself as a growth industry. It’s not like they don’t know all of the above. For whatever reason, they just love to do the same things over and over… Which to me is just insane.

One has to think that sooner or later the folks in the music industry will come to their senses and offer music in open formats at reasonable prices. I’ll be waiting with my wallet open when they do.

Online music: The whole is less than the sum of the parts

What’s wrong with this musical picture?

I gladly admit to being a music junkie – I spent a good part of my younger life playing music for a living, I still play when I can, and I am constantly looking for (and finding) new things to listen to. Sure, I still go back and listen to old favorites, but that has no impact on the drive to discover music yet unheard, artists yet unknown.

I am also pressed for time and have enough income that I am willing to spend some money to acquire music the easy and convenient way.

So the emergence of commercial online music sources should be exactly what I need – lots of information about the artists (usually from the All Music Guide), ways of cross-linking performers and genres, wide (if not comprehensive) selection, and good (if not great) quality sound files.

I’ve been an avid user of the iTunes Music Store since it first went live, and lately I’ve enjoyed trying out the Napster To Go subscription service with a Dell DJ portable player.

So what’s not to like?

It’s the damn copy protection, of course. Let me explain.

I have two computers at work – one Mac and one Windows box. I have a Mac laptop. I have two computers at home, again one Mac and one PC, plus I have a Slim Devices Squeezebox for streaming digital music to my stereo. I have a Rio flash memory mp3 player and would like to buy a hard drive player.

The music purchased from iTunes will play on both Mac and Windows (as long as I use the iTunes application in both places), but not on the Squeezebox or on the Rio or the DJ. The Napster music will work on Windows PCs (as long as I use the Napster application) and on the DJ, but not on the Macs, the Squeezebox, or the Rio.

In addition, there is no way to integrate music from Napster and iTunes together into a single collection, which should be one of the great advantages of managing a music collection on a computer.

All this in the interest of trying to lock up the music so I won’t put it up on a peer-to-peer filesharing network – which I wasn’t going to do do anyway.

Do I occasionally make copies of songs or even entire albums for my friends? Sure – we’ve all been doing that since the advent of cassette recorders in the early ’70s. I didn’t notice that having a negative impact on record sales over the years – did you?

At least with iTunes there are ways of making the files work on other systems. Funny thing – I haven’t noticed Apple’s sales declining either.

So, as much as I’m enjoying the all-you-can-eat model of the Napster subscription, I’m not going to buy an account. I’m sorry, but I’m not willing to let my choice of computing environments be dictated by what music service will play where.

Astute historians will recall that none of this is new – the music industry has a long history of combatting the rise of new ways of enjoying music:

In 1907 the sheet music industry fought against player-piano rolls:

White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company 209 U.S. 1 (1907) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that manufacturers of music rolls for player pianos did not have to pay royalties to the composers. The ruling was based on a holding that the piano rolls were not copies of the plaintiffs’ copyrighted sheet music, but were instead parts of the machine that reproduced the music.

This case was subsequently eclipsed by Congress’s intervention in the form of an amendment to the Copyright Act in 1909, introducing a compulsory license for the manufacture and distribution of such “mechanical” embodiments of musical works.

You can see Chapter 11 of Donald Clarke’s The Rise and Fall of Popular Music for details about the running battles among the record companies and radio stations and publishers during the 1940′s that led to ASCAP publishers boycotting radio stations and a musicians strike.

Right up to the late ’70s where the industry blamed a sales slump on the advent of home taping on cassette recorders:

…anyone who rewinds to the last major music-biz slump will find some interesting parallels. In 1978, record sales began to fall, and the major labels blamed a larcenous new technology: cassette tapes. The international industry even had an outraged official slogan: “Home taping is killing music.” The idea was that music fans—ingrates that they are—would rather pirate songs than pay for them, and that sharing favorite songs was a crime against hard-working musicians (rather than great word-of-mouth advertising). Cassettes were so anathema to the biz that Sex Pistols Svengali Malcolm McLaren could think of no more provocative way to launch his new band, Bow Wow Wow, than with a ode to home taping, “C30, C60, C90, Go!”

By the time Bow Wow Wow bowed in 1980, however, the crisis was almost over. It turned out that home taping had not killed music. Instead, the central problem was the collapsing popularity of dance-pop—lively, sexy, but personality-free music whose appeal was broad but thin. They called it disco back then, and the name has never recovered from the era’s backlash. Although usually termed teen-pop, the music of ‘N Sync and Britney Spears is not unlike disco: Both are intellectually underachieving, cookie-cutter styles that have made stars of performers not known primarily for their skills as singers, songwriters, or musicians.

And so it continues to the present day. Mark Cuban hits the nail on the head yesterday with an essay titled “The definition of insanity.. The Music Industry”, where he says:

There is an old saying that the definition of insanity is, “Doing the same thing over and over again expecting the outcome to change”

I think of this saying everytime I hear about music industry efforts to impact piracy.

After some great summations of the details he goes on to conclude:

The music industry has a very unique opportunity to really re-establish itself as a growth industry. It’s not like they don’t know all of the above. For whatever reason, they just love to do the same things over and over… Which to me is just insane.

One has to think that sooner or later the folks in the music industry will come to their senses and offer music in open formats at reasonable prices. I’ll be waiting with my wallet open when they do.

« Previous Page


subscribe

Pages

Latest tweets

interesting links

What I’m listening to

 

August 2005
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.